View Single Post
  #7  
Old 11 June 2018, 12:39
CB's Avatar
CB CB is offline
BT,WBTWC
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Clarksville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,537
Both convictions affirmed on appeal.

Here's the reported decisions from the Court of Military review.

KINZER:
Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, of conspiracy, larceny, and solicitation of another to commit an offense in violation of Articles 81, 121, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 881, 921, and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for seven years, and reduction to Private E1. In compliance with the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority suspended for two years that part of the sentence extending to confinement in excess of six years, but otherwise approved the sentence as adjudged.

HUBBLE:
The appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officer members on 23 August 1991, of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and larceny in violation of Articles 81 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 881 and 921 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for two years, and reduction to Private E1.
On appeal, the appellant asserts six assignments of error, the first two of which contend that: (1) the finding of guilty of conspiracy to commit armed robbery is incorrect in law and fact, and (2) the finding of guilty of larceny is incorrect in law and fact. We disagree and affirm the findings of guilty and the sentence.


==============

So that much is confirmed.

These are public records.




Attached Files
File Type: pdf 36 Military Justice 780 HUBBLE.pdf (100.5 KB, 7 views)
File Type: pdf 39 Military Justice 559 KINZER.pdf (98.9 KB, 4 views)

Last edited by CB; 11 June 2018 at 12:56.
Reply With Quote