Go Back   SOCNET: The Special Operations Community Network > General Topics > Law Enforcement

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 June 2018, 09:45
MikeC2W's Avatar
MikeC2W MikeC2W is offline
Cry havoc
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ciudad Juarez
Posts: 12,689
Originally Posted by Sharky View Post
Having quite literally smoked thousands of pounds of marijuana and done a whole lot of cocaine in my career, I am not unaware that the lady in the mini-van is also a potential criminal. I was speaking in generalities for the sake of making a point.
Bro, WTF?
Cco 1/75

Two eyes from the east.
Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2018, 17:29
grog18b's Avatar
grog18b grog18b is offline
Clorox bearer for SOTB
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finally back to my 203 range
Posts: 3,749
Originally Posted by Sharky View Post
Police have been doing that since there were Police. I've certainly done it...

...I think the difference is that back in the day people trusted the Police to know which heads needed to be cracked, and which didn't. That trust is almost non-existent today, and it is mostly the fault of LE. Some of it is political fault caving to PC pressure, some of it is the fault of bad internal policy and promoting the wrong people, and some of it is the fault of LEO's not self-policing their own.
Yes. Part of the problem, as I saw it, was newer, college educated youts entering the LEO career field, and letting the power go to their heads, and not being able to differentiate between the heads that needed cracked, and those of the soccer moms of the world. Just wanting to crack everyone's head, just because they were given a badge...

Lack of what we used to call "common sense" abounds too. The "book" followers, where experience is ignored in favor of the "I know better" attitude the newer generations have. Couple that with a lack of respect for experience, and a "I don't care how you do it..." attitude, and you have new LEOs that don't learn from experience, and don't care about yours. They stumble along, hopefully not getting anyone else injured or killed, stepping on everyone's toes, until they are promoted, in order to get them off the streets into a position where hopefully, they will do the least damage.
"....As far as "rights" are concerned... I look at them this way. I don't tell you what church to go to, and you don't tell me what kind of firearm I can own." GROG

If gun control laws controlled crime, we wouldn't need cops.
Finally, I believe that punishing lawful gun owners by creating new, more onerous laws, and restricting Constitutionally guaranteed rights, when we already don't enforce the tens of thousands of gun laws we have on the books, is like beating your dog because the neighbor's dog shit in your yard.
"The Reaper"
Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2018, 11:10
KidA's Avatar
KidA KidA is offline
Authorized Personnel
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WbyGV
Posts: 19,275
Originally Posted by MikeC2W View Post
Bro, WTF?
Ha ha. I read your edit before I saw his post and thought "damn, I didn't know Sharky was cool"

Hey homo, its me -- Andy/SOTB
Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2018, 14:08
Stingray66 Stingray66 is offline
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 96
Originally Posted by gavin View Post
Unfortunately, the current nature of civil liability drives much of LE policy. If a cop pulls over a DUI veteran with PH plates, and decides to leave the car parked, and give the drunk vet a ride somewhere other than jail, the cop (and his agency) incur liability if the car gets stolen or the drunk decides he's good to drive after the cop drops him somewhere. If the cop drops the drunk vet at a friend's house, and the drunk leaves and gets run over...lawsuit.

Arrest the drunk, tow the car incident to chance of lawsuit.
Spot on. In Kansas the law states "shall arrest" and gives no discretion for LEO once field sobriety is conducted. So once field sobriety is started you are required to arrest. Now you may choose to try to be nice and not do field sobriety testing. There is a case recently that covers this scenario. To the best of my memory here is how it went down: Officer makes contact with a young lady. On the dash cam seems to be concerned but can't smell any alcohol. She says she is tired. He tells her to pull into the convenience store parking lot and try to wake herself up. He follows her into the parking lot and then leaves. So does she. She goes missing and is found in car dead in the river. She drove the car down the ramp into the water. She had cocaine and something else in her system. Her family is now suing the officer because he didn't arrest her and should have by law.

Last edited by Stingray66; 21 July 2018 at 14:10. Reason: grammer
Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2018, 18:18
Remington Raider's Avatar
Remington Raider Remington Raider is offline
True Origin Not Known
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: peanut gallery
Posts: 2,028

Police today have a lot less latitude on how to resolve the situation. Everybody has cameras and will screw you in a heartbeat without a thought. People you give a break to will put you in the jackpot. First rule, don't get shot or killed. Second rule, don't get sued. It's the world the "people" or "folks" want.
Wolves and alligators should be cross-bred to make wolfagators that will be silent and fast, and we'll never have to hear from those people, they will just be wolfagator shit.

Are you fucking serious? That's the most ridiculous thing I've heard all week...and I'm at a senior staff planning conference, so, the bar has been set pretty high. You should be proud. - Gavin
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Our new posting rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:20.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc. All Rights Reserved
SOCNET 1996-2018