SOCNET

Go Back   SOCNET - Special Operations | SOF | Military | Current Events > Legacy > Medal of Honor

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24  
Old 15 October 2013, 23:10
Max V. Max V. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOTB View Post
Damn.When I was in, I never saw a situation where units were denied support. I'm not about to state that it never happened or would never happen -- just that I never once saw it.

Fast forward a decade or so, and I'm a civvie in a strange situation. I have people working for me that are armed, I'm in a war zone, and I am not a mil guy nor on any fixed contract with fixed rules -- and beholden to no one. I have had the opportunity on more than one occasion to respond to mil units needing support and fortunately, everything worked out OK. Still, when we went in -- it never dawned on me not to. This has nothing to do with being a badass -- I simply didn't even have the possibility of refusing assisting in my BHG -- call it stupidity or whatever.

Granted, having no rules isn't a great way to run a war -- but I certainly would not have wanted to be on the opposite end of the extreme and in the situation that Capt Swenson and his men were....
I think part of the problem was we were fighting a war that had no clear measurable objectives. A lot of commanders failed to grasp the importance of taking the fight to the enemy and killing as many of those motherfuckers as possible(which experts are now saying is a key part of making COIN work - but I'm not claiming to be an expert). They started seeing it as a two-way live fire JRTC rotation. Emphasis was placed on safety and OERs instead of war fighting. Reflective belts are a good example. Another would be that under 4-4 we had to wear eye protection anytime we were outside of a building. So in a warzone, we had to put on safety glasses to go take a piss at 3 AM - even if we were on a secure FOB.

I think that mentality had a trickle down effect, and it caused a lot of officers(and senior NCOs) to focus too much on "the rules" and not enough on fighting a war. That mentality then pervaded down to the platoon level in some cases, and that was it.


I didn't get a chance to work with too many other platoons downrange, but I know that had it been any of the three rifle platoons in my company we would have went in. The officers were pretty squared away and a lot of the NCOs were on their second or third deployments and were short timers. If they wanted to bring us up on UCMJ for disobeying a chickenshit order in order to help out fellow Americans in a dire situation then so be it. And like you said, it's not about being a badass - it's just incomprehensible that you would do anything else. When I heard that the mounted platoon didn't move in one of the first things I thought of was, "How the fuck do you live with yourself after that?" I'd rather die trying than live with the shame.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Our new posting rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Rights Reserved SOCNET
© SOCNET 1996-2023

Top